Whitehead v. Purnell

2 Miles 434
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County·Decided December 12, 1840·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.—

The question here really is, whether a sale under a younger mortgage destroys a prior lien by judgment, although that judgment is entered on a bond accompanying an elder mortgage. Had there been no judgment, the lien of the mortgage would have remained; it would not have been paid out of the proceeds, and the purchaser would have taken the property subject to it, under the act of 6th April, 1830. (Stroud’s Purd. tit Execution.) The argument that the entry of the judgment on the bond does not alter the case, is not tenable.

Rule discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitehead v. Purnell, 2 Miles 434 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1840).

2 Miles 434 (Whitehead v. Purnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Wilson
34 Pa. 63 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1859)