Whitehead v. King

1923 OK 459, 216 P. 926, 91 Okla. 194, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 712
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 3, 1923
Docket11503
StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK 459 (Whitehead v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitehead v. King, 1923 OK 459, 216 P. 926, 91 Okla. 194, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 712 (Okla. 1923).

Opinion

Opinion by

-STEPHENSON, 0.

The plaintiffs commenced their actiom in the district court of Haskell county for possession of -real estate described in the petition, asserting to be the heirs of the allottee. In the trial of the cause, judgment was. rendered in part for plaintiffs and in part for defendants. This cause has, been regularly assigned and \sutomitted. The plaintiffs in eiror have filed their motion for dismissal of the appeal. The defendants in error are not seeking relief by cross-petition in the action.

It isi therefore anoommended that! -the cause be dismissed.

By the Court: It is bo ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1923 OK 459, 216 P. 926, 91 Okla. 194, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehead-v-king-okla-1923.