Whitehead v. Herron

15 Tex. 127
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1855·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

We have heretofore decided that a plaintiff

may so amend his petition as to change the character or right in which he sues, upon payment of costs, where the change does not operate to deprive the defendant of any defence,' or prejudice any right which may have accrued to him at the time of the amendment. (Henderson v. Kissam, 8 Tex. R. 46.)

It is not pretended that any defence or right had accrued to the defendant in this case, after the filing of the petition, which would be prejudiced by the amendment. The Court, therefore, should not have dismissed the case, because of the amendment ; but should only have adjudged the costs against the plaintiff.

The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitehead v. Herron, 15 Tex. 127 (Tex. 1855).

15 Tex. 127 (Whitehead v. Herron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warnock v. Mills
291 S.W. 850 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1927)
Pryor v. Krause
168 S.W. 498 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Rabb v. Rogers
3 S.W. 303 (Texas Supreme Court, 1887)
Thompson v. Swearengin
48 Tex. 555 (Texas Supreme Court, 1878)
McIlhenny v. M. C. Lee & Co.
43 Tex. 205 (Texas Supreme Court, 1875)
Koschwitz v. Healy
36 Tex. 666 (Texas Supreme Court, 1872)