Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/Whitehead v. Cruse

Whitehead v. Cruse

281 So. 2d 756
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedAugust 31, 1973
DocketNo. 53780
StatusPublished

This text of 281 So. 2d 756 (Whitehead v. Cruse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitehead v. Cruse, 281 So. 2d 756 (La. 1973).

Opinion

In re: Ada Faye Whitehead, Marion J. Brasseaux, Linda Roberts, and Luther Benjamin Roberts applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Franklin. 279 So.2d 802.

Application denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its opinion.

BARHAM and TATE, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted. The decision may also be in conflict with the holding in Kliebert v. Marquette Casualty Co., 119 So.2d 548 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1960), that a dog running into a road does not constitute an emergency sufficient to permit the driver to endanger his passenger’s life.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitehead v. Cruse
279 So. 2d 802 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1973)
Marquette Casualty Co. v. Kliebert
119 So. 2d 548 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 So. 2d 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehead-v-cruse-la-1973.