Whitehall v. State ex rel. Jones

19 Ind. 27
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1862
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 Ind. 27 (Whitehall v. State ex rel. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitehall v. State ex rel. Jones, 19 Ind. 27 (Ind. 1862).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In a suit upon an administrator’s bond, where several breaches are assigned, if one be well assigned, a demurrer to all must be overruled.

• Of a special finding on such breaches, wherein the jury assess damages upion a part of the breaches which are good, and assess none upon the others, the defendants can not complain because the jury did not assess damages against them upon all the breaches.

When the heirs sue specially for injury to them by the malfeasance of the administrator, the fact that the widow has been paid her share, and does not complain, is not a material fact in the suit.

The judgment is affirmed, with five per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vaughn v. Ferrall
57 Ind. 182 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Ind. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehall-v-state-ex-rel-jones-ind-1862.