Whitehall v. State ex rel. Hall

19 Ind. 30
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1862·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a proceeding to remove an administrator for neglect of duty, etc. The removal was made. When we consider the supervisory power of the Probate Court, which our Common Pleas is, over executors, administrators, and guardians, and the duty resting upon that Court to vigilantly exercise it, taken in connection with the amount of personal knowledge in the premises, which the Court will generally, as a matter of course, possess, it will at once be conceded that, in a doubtful case, this Court should not interfere with the action of the Court below. See 2 R. S. by G-. & H., p. 491, and notes. Ind. Ex. Man., p. 174, et scq.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitehall v. State ex rel. Hall, 19 Ind. 30 (Ind. 1862).

19 Ind. 30 (Whitehall v. State ex rel. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowen v. Stewart
26 N.E. 168 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)
In re Holladay's Estate
22 P. 750 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1889)
Williams v. Tobias
37 Ind. 345 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)