Whitehall Pharmacal Co. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Whitehall Pharmacal Co. v. City of New York

16 A.D.2d 920, 230 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8807

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1962·Published

Opinion

Judgment, insofar as it grants plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action and decrees that the sales made by plaintiff to customers in the City of New York are not subject to the city’s general business tax, unanimously reversed, without costs on the law and declaratory judgment directed in favor of appellant City of New York. (See Berkshire Fine Spinning Associates v. City of New York, 5 N Y 2d 347.) Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Bergan, JJ. [10 Misc 2d 548.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, insofar as it grants plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action and decrees that the sales made by plaintiff to customers in the City of New York are not subject to the city’s general business tax, unanimously reversed, without costs on the law and declaratory judgment directed in favor of appellant City of New York. (See Berkshire Fine Spinning Associates v. City of New York, 5 N Y 2d 347.) Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Bergan, JJ. [10 Misc 2d 548.]

Whitehall Pharmacal Co. v. City of New York, 16 A.D.2d 920, 230 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

16 A.D.2d 920 (Whitehall Pharmacal Co. v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related