Home/Fifth Circuit/Whited v. Johnson

Whited v. Johnson

237 F. 1022, 150 C.C.A. 671, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1629
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 24, 1917·No. No. 2896·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

To reform the contract on the ground of mutual mistake complainant’s bill shows no case for equitable relief. To rescind the contract and recover the amounts paid, complainant has an adequate remedy at law. Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whited v. Johnson, 237 F. 1022, 150 C.C.A. 671, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1629 (5th Cir. 1917).

237 F. 1022 (Whited v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.