Whited v. Johnson
237 F. 1022, 150 C.C.A. 671, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1629
This text of 237 F. 1022 (Whited v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Whited v. Johnson, 237 F. 1022, 150 C.C.A. 671, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1629 (5th Cir. 1917).
Opinion
To reform the contract on the ground of mutual mistake complainant’s bill shows no case for equitable relief. To rescind the contract and recover the amounts paid, complainant has an adequate remedy at law. Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
237 F. 1022, 150 C.C.A. 671, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whited-v-johnson-ca5-1917.