Whited v. Gooch

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Whited v. Gooch

1 Gunby 10

DecidedJuly 1, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Gunby 10 (Whited v. Gooch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whited v. Gooch, 1 Gunby 10 (La. Ct. App. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Mayo, J.

Where a sheriff, to whom a writ of fi. fa. has been directed, takes a twelve months’ bond from the judgment debtor, without scrupulously taking all the previous steps prescribed by that part of the Code of Practice which treats of the execution of judgments, such bond is not a legal twelve months’ bond. 30 An. 1269.

2. No execution can issue on such bond against the surety or principal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayo, J.

Where a sheriff, to whom a writ of fi. fa. has been directed, takes a twelve months’ bond from the judgment debtor, without scrupulously taking all the previous steps prescribed by that part of the Code of Practice which treats of the execution of judgments, such bond is not a legal twelve months’ bond. 30 An. 1269.

2. No execution can issue on such bond against the surety or principal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Gunby 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whited-v-gooch-lactapp-1885.