Whited v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

145 So. 3d 951, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13090, 2014 WL 4159997
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 2014·No. No. 1D13-4673·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the circuit court’s order denying in part and dismissing in part his petition for writ of mandamus in which he challenged the Florida Parole Commission’s calculation of his presumptive parole release date. We affirm on all issues but one. We find the circuit court erred in imposing liens on appellant’s inmate trust account for court costs and fees for filing his petition for writ of mandamus and subsequent appeal. See Fla. Parole Comm’n. v. Spaziano, 48 So.3d 714, 724 (Fla.2010); and § 57.085(10), Fla. Stat. Thus, we reverse the circuit court’s orders imposing the liens, and we remand with instructions that the trial court direct that appellant be reimbursed for any funds that were removed from his account. On all other issues, we affirm.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whited v. Florida Commission on Offender Review, 145 So. 3d 951, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13090, 2014 WL 4159997 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

145 So. 3d 951 (Whited v. Florida Commission on Offender Review) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Florida Commission on Offender Review
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Roy S. Whited v. Florida Commission on Offender Review
153 So. 3d 324 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)