Whitecotton v. Landon

64 Ind. 420
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1878
StatusPublished

This text of 64 Ind. 420 (Whitecotton v. Landon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitecotton v. Landon, 64 Ind. 420 (Ind. 1878).

Opinion

Biddle, J.

Complaint on three promissory notes secured by mortgage. Prayer for judgment on the notes, and foreclosure of the mortgage. Answer, general denial. Trial by the court, finding and judgment for appellees. Appeal.

The appellants complain, in this court, because the court below admitted certain notes in evidence over their objections, but what their objections were does not seem to have [421]*421been pointed out to the court below, and we see none. The counsel for the appellants say that the notes introduced were. not. the notes described in the complaint, but the bill of exceptions says that “The plaintiffs, in order to sustain their cause, introduced the following evidence, to wit, the three original notes mentioned in complaint, as follows.” Here the notes are set out. The mortgage offered and introduced as evidence over the objections of the appellants corresponds with the mortgage described in the complaint. No objections to it were pointed out to the court below, and this court has not been able to find any.

These are all the questions discussed in the appellants’ 'brief. Neither are well taken.

• The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellants, with four percent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Ind. 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitecotton-v-landon-ind-1878.