Whiteaker ex rel. Parker v. Gilreath

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Whiteaker ex rel. Parker v. Gilreath

693 So. 2d 118, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4965, 1997 WL 232131

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 9, 1997

DocketNo. 96-03064

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 693 So. 2d 118 (Whiteaker ex rel. Parker v. Gilreath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whiteaker ex rel. Parker v. Gilreath, 693 So. 2d 118, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4965, 1997 WL 232131 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellants challenge the summary judgment entered in favor of appellee. We reverse. Ryan Paul Whiteaker was injured when the bucket of a Bobcat bucket loader fell on him. Appellee, Don Gilreath, was sued as owner of the bucket loader. Summary judgment was entered in favor of Gil-reath on the basis that there was no issue of material fact which would tend to indicate that Gilreath was the owner at the time of the accident. We disagree. The affidavit on file and the circumstances of the case fail to preclude at least an inference that Gilreath was the owner of the bucket loader at the time of the accident. Where there is the slightest doubt as to the question of ownership, summary judgment is impermissible. See Knight v. Roberts RV Resort, 671 So.2d 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

SCHOONOVER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellants challenge the summary judgment entered in favor of appellee. We reverse. Ryan Paul Whiteaker was injured when the bucket of a Bobcat bucket loader fell on him. Appellee, Don Gilreath, was sued as owner of the bucket loader. Summary judgment was entered in favor of Gil-reath on the basis that there was no issue of material fact which would tend to indicate that Gilreath was the owner at the time of the accident. We disagree. The affidavit on file and the circumstances of the case fail to preclude at least an inference that Gilreath was the owner of the bucket loader at the time of the accident. Where there is the slightest doubt as to the question of ownership, summary judgment is impermissible. See Knight v. Roberts RV Resort, 671 So.2d 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

SCHOONOVER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

693 So. 2d 118, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4965, 1997 WL 232131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whiteaker-ex-rel-parker-v-gilreath-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack