White v. Zane
This text of 10 Mich. 333 (White v. Zane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The property of the wife does not, under our statute, become the husband’s by user, or by the simple possession of it by him. The object of the statute was to prevent this result, and to abolish the common law rule respecting the marital rights of the husband over his wife’s property.
The husband can not acquire the property of -his wife except by gift or purchase, any more than he can that of a feme sole. Such gift or purchase must be established by some other evidence than that of use and possession. (See Wales v. Newbould, 9 Mich. 45).
The judgment must be reversed, and a judgment entered for the plaintiff for $220,98, as of September 13, 1861, with costs of both courts.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Mich. 333, 1862 Mich. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-zane-mich-1862.