White v. Young
This text of 166 A.2d 663 (White v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The order of the court of common pleas, dismissing the defendant’s objection to equity’s jurisdiction of the subject matter on the ground that there is a complete and adequate remedy at law, did not raise a question of jurisdiction appealable under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 PS §672 et seq. See Korona v. Bensalem Township, 385 Pa. 283, 284, 122 A. 2d 688. The appeal should therefore have been dismissed.
The order of the Superior Court is vacated and the appeal from the court of common pleas dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 A.2d 663, 402 Pa. 61, 14 Oil & Gas Rep. 823, 1960 Pa. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-young-pa-1960.