White v. Young

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

White v. Young

166 A.2d 663, 402 Pa. 61, 14 Oil & Gas Rep. 823, 1960 Pa. LEXIS 396

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 15, 1960·No. Appeal, 185·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the court of common pleas, dismissing the defendant’s objection to equity’s jurisdiction of the subject matter on the ground that there is a complete and adequate remedy at law, did not raise a question of jurisdiction appealable under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 PS §672 et seq. See Korona v. Bensalem Township, 385 Pa. 283, 284, 122 A. 2d 688. The appeal should therefore have been dismissed.

The order of the Superior Court is vacated and the appeal from the court of common pleas dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the court of common pleas, dismissing the defendant’s objection to equity’s jurisdiction of the subject matter on the ground that there is a complete and adequate remedy at law, did not raise a question of jurisdiction appealable under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 PS §672 et seq. See Korona v. Bensalem Township, 385 Pa. 283, 284, 122 A. 2d 688. The appeal should therefore have been dismissed.

The order of the Superior Court is vacated and the appeal from the court of common pleas dismissed at appellant’s costs.

White v. Young, 166 A.2d 663, 402 Pa. 61, 14 Oil & Gas Rep. 823, 1960 Pa. LEXIS 396 (Pa. 1960).

Pincite

166 A.2d 663 (White v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related