White v. Woodall

134 S. Ct. 373, 187 L. Ed. 2d 14, 571 U.S. 809, 82 U.S.L.W. 3178, 2013 WL 5507342, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5250
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. Woodall. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 S. Ct. 1697
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 7, 2013·No. No. 12–794.·Published

Opinion

Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted. Laurence E. Komp, Esquire, of Manchester, Missouri, is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Woodall, 134 S. Ct. 373, 187 L. Ed. 2d 14, 571 U.S. 809, 82 U.S.L.W. 3178, 2013 WL 5507342, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5250 (U.S. 2013).

134 S. Ct. 373 (White v. Woodall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.