White v. Willis
This text of 24 Mass. 143 (White v. Willis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plea sets forth a good bar, but the replication avoids it, by saying that the woodland was used as an appendage to the dwellinghouse and cultivated land for the purposes of procuring fuel and timber for repairs. We know of no authority for the suggestion, that the dowress has a right to take fire-bote, &c. without an assignment of her dower in the woodlot. This case is distinguished from those heretofore decided respecting dower. The Court have limited the dis-allowance of dower to wild land, which is not used with the homestead or with cultivated land.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Mass. 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-willis-mass-1828.