White v. Whittal

Michigan Supreme Court

White v. Whittal

71 N.W. 1118, 113 Mich. 493, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 821

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 28, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 71 N.W. 1118 (White v. Whittal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Whittal, 71 N.W. 1118, 113 Mich. 493, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 821 (Mich. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Grant, J.

Plaintiff and defendant had a disgraceful fight in the public highway, in the presence of their own children and neighbors, on their way home from a school meeting. The language used was also disgraceful. Each charged the other with commencing the assault, and introduced testimony tending to sustain the charge. There is also testimony tending to show that the fight was mutual, each being “eager for the fray.” Plaintiff was worsted in the fight. He entered a criminal prosecution for assault and battery against defendant, who was acquitted upon the trial. He then brought this action for damages, and the jury again found against him, either upon the theory that he was the assaulter or that the fight was voluntary. The court fully explained to the jury the claim of each party and the correct rules of law governing the case. A [494]*494discussion of the points raised would be of no benefit to any one.

We find no error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Long, C. J., Montgomery and Moore, JJ., concurred. Hooker, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant, J.

Plaintiff and defendant had a disgraceful fight in the public highway, in the presence of their own children and neighbors, on their way home from a school meeting. The language used was also disgraceful. Each charged the other with commencing the assault, and introduced testimony tending to sustain the charge. There is also testimony tending to show that the fight was mutual, each being “eager for the fray.” Plaintiff was worsted in the fight. He entered a criminal prosecution for assault and battery against defendant, who was acquitted upon the trial. He then brought this action for damages, and the jury again found against him, either upon the theory that he was the assaulter or that the fight was voluntary. The court fully explained to the jury the claim of each party and the correct rules of law governing the case. A [494]*494discussion of the points raised would be of no benefit to any one.

We find no error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Long, C. J., Montgomery and Moore, JJ., concurred. Hooker, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 N.W. 1118, 113 Mich. 493, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-whittal-mich-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack