White v. White
This text of 50 A. 157 (White v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are satisfied from our examination of the testimony in this case that it was for the consideration of the jury, and if credited by them it was sufficient to overcome the presumption of payment. The case was carefully submitted to the jury under instructions which were unobjectionable. We find no error in either of the specifications and we therefore affirm the judgment entered on the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A. 157, 200 Pa. 565, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-white-pa-1901.