White v. White

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

White v. White

50 A. 157, 200 Pa. 565, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 533

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 11, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 104·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are satisfied from our examination of the testimony in this case that it was for the consideration of the jury, and if credited by them it was sufficient to overcome the presumption of payment. The case was carefully submitted to the jury under instructions which were unobjectionable. We find no error in either of the specifications and we therefore affirm the judgment entered on the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We are satisfied from our examination of the testimony in this case that it was for the consideration of the jury, and if credited by them it was sufficient to overcome the presumption of payment. The case was carefully submitted to the jury under instructions which were unobjectionable. We find no error in either of the specifications and we therefore affirm the judgment entered on the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

White v. White, 50 A. 157, 200 Pa. 565, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 533 (Pa. 1901).

Pincite

50 A. 157 (White v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related