White v. White

567 P.2d 622, 30 Or. App. 665, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1649
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 17, 1977
DocketNo. 67003, CA 7583
StatusPublished

This text of 567 P.2d 622 (White v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. White, 567 P.2d 622, 30 Or. App. 665, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1649 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the father from an order modifying a decree of divorce and requiring him to pay support for his child.1

It would serve no purpose to set out the particular facts of this case. There is a sufficient change of circumstances, including the unsatisfactoriness of the prior arrangement wherein the child lived in the father’s home, to justify a change in the support order. The father remains willing to provide a home for the child while she goes to college, but he does not wish to make money payments. Since he is not the custodial parent of the child, he is obliged to provide support in the form of money payments.

Affirmed. Costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lekas v. Lekas
543 P.2d 308 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
567 P.2d 622, 30 Or. App. 665, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-white-orctapp-1977.