White v. White

567 P.2d 622, 30 Or. App. 665, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1649
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 17, 1977·No. No. 67003, CA 7583·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the father from an order modifying a decree of divorce and requiring him to pay support for his child.1

It would serve no purpose to set out the particular facts of this case. There is a sufficient change of circumstances, including the unsatisfactoriness of the prior arrangement wherein the child lived in the father’s home, to justify a change in the support order. The father remains willing to provide a home for the child while she goes to college, but he does not wish to make money payments. Since he is not the custodial parent of the child, he is obliged to provide support in the form of money payments.

Affirmed. Costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. White, 567 P.2d 622, 30 Or. App. 665, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1649 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

567 P.2d 622 (White v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lekas v. Lekas
543 P.2d 308 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1975)