White v. White

527 So. 2d 971, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1643, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2939, 1988 WL 70666
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 13, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1751
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 527 So. 2d 971 (White v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. White, 527 So. 2d 971, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1643, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2939, 1988 WL 70666 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The wife appeals from a final judgment of dissolution. We reverse and remand with direction that the trial court enter a subsequent order which reflects its consideration of the husband’s private pension plan and its determination based upon that consideration in accordance with Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer, 491 So.2d 265 (Fla.1986), and which increases the future permanent alimony of the wife, the record compelling an increased award.

GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carlson v. Carlson
549 So. 2d 1160 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Stringfellow v. Stringfellow
529 So. 2d 357 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
527 So. 2d 971, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1643, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2939, 1988 WL 70666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-white-fladistctapp-1988.