White v. White

149 So. 375, 108 Fla. 380
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 19, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 149 So. 375 (White v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. White, 149 So. 375, 108 Fla. 380 (Fla. 1933).

Opinions

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice BUFORD, Mr. Justice ELLIS and Mr. Justice BROWN are of opinion that the judgment in this cause should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice DAVIS are of opinion that the said judgment should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So.2d R. 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

BUFORD, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN and DAVIS, J. J., concur.

ON REHEARING.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Recio v. Simpson
10 So. 2d 909 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
Hand v. Smith
170 So. 123 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 So. 375, 108 Fla. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-white-fla-1933.