White v. White

Supreme Court of Arkansas

White v. White

52 Ark. 188

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 15, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 52 Ark. 188 (White v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. White, 52 Ark. 188 (Ark. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Advancement: Statute of Limitations. The presumption of the law is that the purchase of the land in controversy was by way of advancement to the son. Robinson v. Robinson, 43 Ark., 481. The proof does not overcome this presumption.

The statute of limitations does not aid defendant under the facts of this case. The oceupancy of .each was with reference to parental and filial duty. White and Tudot’s Leading Cases in Eq., vol. 1, pt. 1, p. 331; Sidmouth v. Sidmouth, 2 Beavans, 447.

The decree is reversed with costs, and the cause remanded with direction to the Washington Circuit Court to enter a decree giving plaintiff possession of the premises sued for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Advancement: Statute of Limitations. The presumption of the law is that the purchase of the land in controversy was by way of advancement to the son. Robinson v. Robinson, 43 Ark., 481. The proof does not overcome this presumption.

The statute of limitations does not aid defendant under the facts of this case. The oceupancy of .each was with reference to parental and filial duty. White and Tudot’s Leading Cases in Eq., vol. 1, pt. 1, p. 331; Sidmouth v. Sidmouth, 2 Beavans, 447.

The decree is reversed with costs, and the cause remanded with direction to the Washington Circuit Court to enter a decree giving plaintiff possession of the premises sued for.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Ark. 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-white-ark-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack