White v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
This text of 190 Md. 733 (White v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus.
This petitioner claims that he was sentenced to one year for larceny in the People’s Court in Salisbury, Maryland, which was too long a time for that offense; further, that he was sentenced for one year on the charge of assault with a knife. He says that this could not have happened because his accuser was drunk at the time. If the sentence was too severe, his redress is through the executive authorities. He could have obtained a trial de novo by appeal to the Circuit Court. Article 52, sec. 13; Green v. State, 113 Md. 154, 77 A. 677. The questions of guilt or innocence and the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be retried on habeas corpus. Olewiler v. Brady, 185 Md. 341, 344, 44 A. 2d 807; Bernard v. Warden, 187 Md. 273, 49 A. 2d 737; Copeland v. Wright, 188 Md. 666, 53 A. 2d 553; Rountree v. Warden, 189 Md. 292, 55 A. 2d 847.
Application denied, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 Md. 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-warden-of-maryland-house-of-correction-md-1947.