White v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

White v. Warden

215 A.2d 475, 240 Md. 736, 1966 Md. LEXIS 774

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided January 5, 1966·No. App. No. 64·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The application of Robert Galloway White for leave to appeal from the order denying him post conviction relief from his imprisonment for first degree murder is hereby denied for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Judge Harlan in the lower court.

Even if the testimony of the applicant had not excluded him from the application of Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U. S. 478, to the facts of this case with regard to his claim that he was not advised of his entitlement to counsel and his right to remain silent during his interrogation by the police, we decided in Hyde [737]*737v. State, 240 Md. 661, that Escobedo should not be applied retrospectively in a factual situation similar to that in this case.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The application of Robert Galloway White for leave to appeal from the order denying him post conviction relief from his imprisonment for first degree murder is hereby denied for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Judge Harlan in the lower court.

Even if the testimony of the applicant had not excluded him from the application of Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U. S. 478, to the facts of this case with regard to his claim that he was not advised of his entitlement to counsel and his right to remain silent during his interrogation by the police, we decided in Hyde [737]*737v. State, 240 Md. 661, that Escobedo should not be applied retrospectively in a factual situation similar to that in this case.

Application denied.

White v. Warden, 215 A.2d 475, 240 Md. 736, 1966 Md. LEXIS 774 (Md. 1966).

Pincite

215 A.2d 475 (White v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related