White v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Texas
DecidedAugust 24, 2022
Docket4:22-cv-02120
StatusUnknown

This text of White v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC (White v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, (S.D. Tex. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF, TEXAS pistict cor Fe SOU GED District Of Texas . ENTERED Tataneisha White, § August 25, 2022 § Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Plaintiffs, § : § versus § Civil Action H-22-21200 □

Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, : § Defendant. §

_ Opinion and Order on Partial Dismissal —

I. Background. - On December 5, 2020, Tataneisha White says she slipped on a clear substance while shopping at Wal-Mart. She sued Wal-mart for: (a) premises liability, (b) negligence related to premises conditions, (c) failures related to policies, procedures, safety rules, and guidelines, (d) negligence in hiring, training, controlling, and supervising employees, and (e) negligent hiring, supervision, and retention of employees. Wal-mart moved for partial dismissal for her negligence claims. White had 21 days to file a response under Local Rule 7.3. She did not respond to Wal- mart’s motion, so it is deemed unopposed.” Also, she has pleaded no facts showing Wal-mart is liable for negligence.

2. Negligence. . Slip-and-fall claims are typically premises liability.* Negligence is a distinct claim. Negligent activity requires that White plead an affirmative,

* Local Rule 7.4 * Keetch v. Kroger Co., 845 S.W.ad 262, 264 (Tex. 1992). □

activity that caused the injury. She must also plead that an employee committed an. actionable tort and Wal-Mart was independently negligent in the course of hiring to hold it liable for negligent training and supervision.* □ White pleaded that she slipped and fell on a clear substance. No facts support her claim that a Wal-mart employee was performing an ongoing activity before White fell. . She attempted to plead negligent supervision and training without giving facts that show an employee committed a tort and Wal-Mart committed an act of negligence by hiring the employee.

3. Conclusion. Because Tataneisha White failed to plead her negligence claim, it is dismissed with prejudice. Her premises liability claim subsists. (9)

Signed on August ask, 2022, at Houston, Texas.

> A | | 3 a = Lynn N. Hughes . United States District Judge

3 Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. Smith, 307 S.W.3d 762, 776 (Tex. 2010). 4 Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dalls, Inc., 868 S.W.2d 942, 950 (Tex. App. — Amrillo 1994).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. Smith
307 S.W.3d 762 (Texas Supreme Court, 2010)
Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.
868 S.W.2d 942 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
White v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-wal-mart-stores-texas-llc-txsd-2022.