White v. Vilsack

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. Vilsack. Read the opinion of the Court — 80 F. Supp. 3d 123
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided February 19, 2015·No. Civil Action No. 2014-0478·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

RONALD L. WHITE et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 14-0478 (PLF)

)

TOM VILSACK, Secretary, ) United States Department of Agriculture, )

)

Defendant. )

___________________________________ )

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion issued this

same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s motion [Dkt. No. 4] to dismiss the plaintiffs’

complaint is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

The Clerk of the Court shall remove this case from the Court’s docket. This is a final appealable

order. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a).

SO ORDERED.

/s/__________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: February 19, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Vilsack, (D.D.C. 2015).

White v. Vilsack (White v. Vilsack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.