White v. United States

592 A.2d 480, 1991 D.C. App. LEXIS 189, 1991 WL 101101
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 D.C. App. LEXIS 198
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided May 31, 1991·No. No. 89-629·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division * that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of November 27, 1990, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before June 10, 1991.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. United States, 592 A.2d 480, 1991 D.C. App. LEXIS 189, 1991 WL 101101 (D.C. 1991).

592 A.2d 480 (White v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.