White v. United States

Fourth Circuit

White v. United States

30 F. App'x 84

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2002·No. 01-7691·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward Warlick White, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion under the All Writs Act attacking his conviction for aiding and abetting the distribution of cocaine and marijuana. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible er *85 ror. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. White v. United States, No. CA-01-445-2-3-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Aug. 15, 2001, entered Aug. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Edward Warlick White, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion under the All Writs Act attacking his conviction for aiding and abetting the distribution of cocaine and marijuana. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible er *85 ror. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. White v. United States, No. CA-01-445-2-3-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Aug. 15, 2001, entered Aug. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

White v. United States, 30 F. App'x 84 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

30 F. App'x 84 (White v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.