White v. Tisdale's

211 S.W. 571, 184 Ky. 254, 1919 Ky. LEXIS 43
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMay 13, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 S.W. 571 (White v. Tisdale's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Tisdale's, 211 S.W. 571, 184 Ky. 254, 1919 Ky. LEXIS 43 (Ky. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Dismissing the appeal.

Alleging that he had performed services for J. M. Tisdale of the reasonable value of $512.40, plaintiff, J. D. White, brought this suit against his executor to recover that sum, subject to a credit of $14.50. A trial before a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment in his ■favor for $100.00. The appeal by plaintiff was granted below.

[255]*255On appeal by a plaintiff, the amount in controversy is the difference between the sum sued for and the sum recovered. Here, the sum sued for was $497.90, and as the sum recovered was only $100.00, the amount in controversy is $397.90. On appeal from a money judgment, where the amount*in controversy is less than $500.00, the circuit court is without jurisdiction to grant the appeal. Childers v. Ratliff, 164 Ky. 123, 175 S. W. 25; Oman-Bowling Green Stone Co. v. Louisville & N. R. R. Co., 169 Ky. 832, 185 S. W. 118. In such a case an appeal can be granted only by this court upon proper application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Legates v. Heverin
196 A.2d 403 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 S.W. 571, 184 Ky. 254, 1919 Ky. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-tisdales-kyctapp-1919.