White v. Tequesta HMA, Inc.

945 So. 2d 659, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 425, 2007 WL 101192
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 17, 2007·No. No. 4D06-1768·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order dismissing the complaint and remand to the circuit court for appellant to have a chance to amend her complaint, so that she has an opportunity to demonstrate that the causes of action alleged fall outside of the presuit [660]*660screening requirements of section 766.106, Florida Statutes (2005).

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Tequesta HMA, Inc., 945 So. 2d 659, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 425, 2007 WL 101192 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

945 So. 2d 659 (White v. Tequesta HMA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.