White v. Supreme Court of Appeals

22 Ct. Cl. 128
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedNovember 18, 1998
DocketCC-98-104
StatusPublished

This text of 22 Ct. Cl. 128 (White v. Supreme Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Supreme Court of Appeals, 22 Ct. Cl. 128 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer. The Court, having reviewed the record, is of the opinion that its original order of June 2, 1998, was issued in error, and does hereby issue this REVISED OPINION for reasons stated more fully below.

Claimant seeks $2,401.94 for legal services rendered as guardian ad litem to represent an infant in an appeal before the respondent. In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity of the claim and further states that there is no statutory method or procedure by which to pay the claim. The Court, having reviewed the applicable law, finds that there is no statutory basis upon which to compel payment of the claimant’s expenses. Quesinberry vs. Quesinberry, 443 S.E.2d 222 (W.Va. 1992).

However, the Court is of the opinion that this is a claim that in equity and good conscience should be paid, and therefore, does hereby make an award in the amount of $2,401.94.

Award of $2,401.94.

S

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quesinberry v. Quesinberry
443 S.E.2d 222 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Ct. Cl. 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-supreme-court-of-appeals-wvctcl-1998.