White v. Stiner

209 P. 598, 36 Idaho 129, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 130
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided September 28, 1922·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

MCCARTHY, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court sustaining respondent’s motion to strike appellant’s second amended complaint from the files. No judgment was entered.

Such an order is not appealable. (C. S., sec. 7152.) The order not being appealable, this court has no jurisdiction and the appeal should be dismissed on the court’s own motion. (Holter v. Hauser, 33 Ida. 406, 195 Pac. 628; Davis v. Bach, 33 Ida. 551, 196 Pac. 673; Continental etc. Bank v. Werner, 33 Ida. 764, 198 Pac. 471.) It is so ordered. Costs are awarded to respondents.

Rice, C. J., and Dunn and Lee, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Stiner, 209 P. 598, 36 Idaho 129, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 130 (Idaho 1922).

209 P. 598 (White v. Stiner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hoffman
660 P.2d 1353 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1983)
Aumock v. Kilborn
16 P.2d 975 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1932)
Blaine County Investment Co. v. Mays
15 P.2d 734 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1932)
Capital Water Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
237 P. 423 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1925)
Young v. Washington Water Power Co.
228 P. 323 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1924)