White v. Steele's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

White v. Steele's Administrator

287 S.W.2d 429

Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided February 17, 1956·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was instituted by the appellants against Grannis Bach, as administrator of the estate of Ester J. Steele, and his bondsmen, to recover some $900 for the alleged mishandling of the estate of Ester J. Steele by Grannis Bach.

We have examined the record fully and have reached the conclusion that the judgment of the trial court was proper. :

Wherefore, the motion for. an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action was instituted by the appellants against Grannis Bach, as administrator of the estate of Ester J. Steele, and his bondsmen, to recover some $900 for the alleged mishandling of the estate of Ester J. Steele by Grannis Bach.

We have examined the record fully and have reached the conclusion that the judgment of the trial court was proper. :

Wherefore, the motion for. an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

White v. Steele's Administrator, 287 S.W.2d 429 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

287 S.W.2d 429 (White v. Steele's Administrator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.