White v. Steele's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

White v. Steele's Administrator

287 S.W.2d 429

DecidedFebruary 17, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 287 S.W.2d 429 (White v. Steele's Administrator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Steele's Administrator, 287 S.W.2d 429 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was instituted by the appellants against Grannis Bach, as administrator of the estate of Ester J. Steele, and his bondsmen, to recover some $900 for the alleged mishandling of the estate of Ester J. Steele by Grannis Bach.

We have examined the record fully and have reached the conclusion that the judgment of the trial court was proper. :

Wherefore, the motion for. an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action was instituted by the appellants against Grannis Bach, as administrator of the estate of Ester J. Steele, and his bondsmen, to recover some $900 for the alleged mishandling of the estate of Ester J. Steele by Grannis Bach.

We have examined the record fully and have reached the conclusion that the judgment of the trial court was proper. :

Wherefore, the motion for. an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 S.W.2d 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-steeles-administrator-kyctapp-1956.