White v. Stayton Canning Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

White v. Stayton Canning Co.

616 P.2d 579, 48 Or. App. 227, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3829

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 15, 1980

DocketNo. 78-1307, CA 17200

StatusPublished

This text of 616 P.2d 579 (White v. Stayton Canning Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Stayton Canning Co., 616 P.2d 579, 48 Or. App. 227, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3829 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In determining that this claimant is permanently and totally disabled, the referee properly analyzed the factors of claimant’s age, training, aptitude, adaptability to do nonphysical labor, mental capacity and emotional condition, as well as the state of the labor market. Wilson v. Weyerhaeuser, 30 or App 403, 409, 567 P2d 567 (1977).

In making a determination that claimant has only a permanent partial disability, the Board erred.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In determining that this claimant is permanently and totally disabled, the referee properly analyzed the factors of claimant’s age, training, aptitude, adaptability to do nonphysical labor, mental capacity and emotional condition, as well as the state of the labor market. Wilson v. Weyerhaeuser, 30 or App 403, 409, 567 P2d 567 (1977).

In making a determination that claimant has only a permanent partial disability, the Board erred.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 P.2d 579, 48 Or. App. 227, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-stayton-canning-co-orctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack