White v. State

234 S.W.2d 876, 155 Tex. Crim. 303, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1849
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 6, 1950·No. 24993·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Attempting to pass a forged check is the offense; the punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

The count in the indictment upon which this conviction rests charges that appellant, knowing it to be forged, attempted to pass a forged check to one Smith.

All the testimony shows that the check was presented and attempted to be passed to one Brown, who was an employee of the store of which Smith was the assistant manager.

This constitutes a fatal variance between the allegations of the indictment and the proof. Brown v. State, 71 Tex. Cr. R. 45, 158 S. W. 533; Crisp v. State, 144 Tex. Cr. R. 163 S. W. 2d 209.

The state’s attorney before this court concedes the variance.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 234 S.W.2d 876, 155 Tex. Crim. 303, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1849 (Tex. 1950).

234 S.W.2d 876 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dukes v. State
742 S.W.2d 472 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Woodard v. State
700 S.W.2d 617 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Pitt v. State
362 S.W.2d 117 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)
Vestal v. State
283 S.W.2d 955 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1955)