White v. State

5 S.W.2d 510

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 102 Tex. Crim. 456 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 18, 1928·No. No. 11538·Published

Opinion

MARTIN, J.

Offense, knowingly passing forged instrument; penalty, four years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

No bills of exception appear in the record. We have carefully read the statement of facts, and, believing the evidence sufficient, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARTIN, J.

Offense, knowingly passing forged instrument; penalty, four years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

No bills of exception appear in the record. We have carefully read the statement of facts, and, believing the evidence sufficient, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

White v. State, 5 S.W.2d 510 (Tex. 1928).

Pincite

5 S.W.2d 510 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.