White v. State
106 S.W. 1167, 52 Tex. Crim. 193, 1907 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 300
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 4, 1907·No. No. 3749.·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
This record has neither statement of faetsj nor bills of exception.
The first and second grounds of the motion for new trial relate to the testimony and cannot be revised. The third ground complains of the remarks of the county attorney and refers to the bill of exceptions, which is not in the record. The two remaining grounds are with reference to' the charge and, of course, cannot be revised, in the absence of the statement of facts. The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Henderson, Judge, absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. State, 106 S.W. 1167, 52 Tex. Crim. 193, 1907 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 300 (Tex. 1907).
106 S.W. 1167 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holder v. State
194 S.W. 162 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Ward v. State
140 S.W. 1109 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)