White v. State
This text of 106 S.W. 1167 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This record has neither statement of faetsj nor bills of exception.
The first and second grounds of the motion for new trial relate to the testimony and cannot be revised. The third ground complains of the remarks of the county attorney and refers to the bill of exceptions, which is not in the record. The two remaining grounds are with reference to' the charge and, of course, cannot be revised, in the absence of the statement of facts. The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Henderson, Judge, absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 S.W. 1167, 52 Tex. Crim. 193, 1907 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-texcrimapp-1907.