White v. State
1929 OK CR 385, 280 P. 1119, 44 Okla. Crim. 343, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 111
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 Okla. Crim. 50 →
Opinion
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Dewey county on a charge of grand larceny, and was sentenced to serve a term of one year in the state penitentiary.
*344 The record discloses that at the time charged defendant committed the larceny of 70 bushels of wheat, of the value of $80. No briefs have been filed by plaintiff in error. An examination of the record discloses no jurisdictional nor fundamental error.
The case is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. State, 1929 OK CR 385, 280 P. 1119, 44 Okla. Crim. 343, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 111 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).
1929 OK CR 385 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.