White v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

White v. State

1912 OK CR 35, 119 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 705, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 302

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 4, 1912

DocketNo. A-1072.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 35 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. State, 1912 OK CR 35, 119 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 705, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 302 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

W. E. White, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the county court of Creek county of a violation of -the prohibition law and was sentenced to serve a term of thirty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. December 12, 1910, judgment and sentence was entered. To reverse this judgment an appeal was taken. When the case was this day called on the regular assignment for final submission the Attorney General moved to affirm for failure to proseeute the appeal. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made on behalf of the plaintiff in error. The appeal having been abandoned. The motion to affirm is hereby sustained. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

W. E. White, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the county court of Creek county of a violation of -the prohibition law and was sentenced to serve a term of thirty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. December 12, 1910, judgment and sentence was entered. To reverse this judgment an appeal was taken. When the case was this day called on the regular assignment for final submission the Attorney General moved to affirm for failure to proseeute the appeal. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made on behalf of the plaintiff in error. The appeal having been abandoned. The motion to affirm is hereby sustained. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 35, 119 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 705, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.