White v. State

13 Ohio St. 569, 13 Ohio St. (N.S.) 569
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1862·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the CoüRT

A verdict and sentence for an assault only might be rendered under such an indictment. The assault was properly and sufficiently described, without adding the words “in a menacing manner,” contained in the statute which provides for punishing an assault. 1 S. & C. 428. The sentence of the court, in connection with the verdict of the jury, is sufficient to preclude a second indictment for the same offense. And it was not necessary that the indictment should be indorsed by the prosecutor for costs.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 13 Ohio St. 569, 13 Ohio St. (N.S.) 569 (Ohio 1862).

13 Ohio St. 569 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McCoy
88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 447 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1913)
Lindsey v. State
1 Ohio Law Rep. 735 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1903)
Mitchell v. State
42 Ohio St. (N.S.) 383 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1884)
Whitlock v. Willard
18 Fla. 156 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1881)