White v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

White v. State

13 Ohio St. 569, 13 Ohio St. (N.S.) 569

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1862

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 13 Ohio St. 569 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. State, 13 Ohio St. 569, 13 Ohio St. (N.S.) 569 (Ohio 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

By the CoüRT

A verdict and sentence for an assault only might be rendered under such an indictment. The assault was properly and sufficiently described, without adding the words “in a menacing manner,” contained in the statute which provides for punishing an assault. 1 S. & C. 428. The sentence of the court, in connection with the verdict of the jury, is sufficient to preclude a second indictment for the same offense. And it was not necessary that the indictment should be indorsed by the prosecutor for costs.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the CoüRT

A verdict and sentence for an assault only might be rendered under such an indictment. The assault was properly and sufficiently described, without adding the words “in a menacing manner,” contained in the statute which provides for punishing an assault. 1 S. & C. 428. The sentence of the court, in connection with the verdict of the jury, is sufficient to preclude a second indictment for the same offense. And it was not necessary that the indictment should be indorsed by the prosecutor for costs.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ohio St. 569, 13 Ohio St. (N.S.) 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-ohio-1862.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack