White v. State

223 S.W.3d 186, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 781, 2007 WL 1468869
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 22, 2007·No. ED 89052·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Christopher White, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 223 S.W.3d 186, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 781, 2007 WL 1468869 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

223 S.W.3d 186 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Challans
223 S.W.3d 186 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)