White v. State

223 S.W.3d 186, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 781, 2007 WL 1468869
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 22, 2007
DocketED 89052
StatusPublished

This text of 223 S.W.3d 186 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. State, 223 S.W.3d 186, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 781, 2007 WL 1468869 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Christopher White, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Challans
223 S.W.3d 186 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 S.W.3d 186, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 781, 2007 WL 1468869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-moctapp-2007.