White v. State

48 So. 611, 95 Miss. 75
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1909·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mayes, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We do not think the amendment to the affidavit should have been allowed by the court. This case cannot be distinguished from the case of Hudson v. State, 73 Miss. 784, 19 South. 965.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 48 So. 611, 95 Miss. 75 (Mich. 1909).

48 So. 611 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horn v. State
147 So. 310 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)