White v. State
This text of 73 Miss. 50 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
“That a juror may be a witness on a trial before himself and his fellows is well settled. ” Roy v. Horsley, 25 Am. Rep., [51]*51540, note. A juror may always be a witness for either party, and still retain his seat as a juror. ’ ’ Fellows' Case, 5 Me., 335. To the same effect are Rex v. Rosser, 7 Car. & P., 648; 32 E. C. L., 803, a criminal case; Manley v. Shaw, 41 E. C. L., 200; 1 Car. & M., 361, a civil case; Thomp. & M. on Jur., § 216. It is held in State v. Jacob, 30 S. C., 131, s.c. 11 Am. St. Rep., 897, that a juror, in weighing the credibility of testimony, has a right to take into consideration his own knowledge of the character of the witness delivering such testimony — as to which we say nothing. In this case the jurors testified only to character.
We find no reversible error in the other assignments.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 Miss. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-miss-1895.