White v. State

33 A.3d 932, 423 Md. 689, 2011 Md. LEXIS 774

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 419 Md. 265 →

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 19, 2011·No. No. 42·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

ORDER.

The Court having considered the motion for reconsideration filed by the Petitioner in the above entitled case, it is this 19th day of December, 2011

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that its opinion filed in this case on October 24, 2011 be, and it is hereby withdrawn, and it is further

ORDERED in light of this motion for reconsideration, the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

ORDER.

The Court having considered the motion for reconsideration filed by the Petitioner in the above entitled case, it is this 19th day of December, 2011

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that its opinion filed in this case on October 24, 2011 be, and it is hereby withdrawn, and it is further

ORDERED in light of this motion for reconsideration, the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

White v. State, 33 A.3d 932, 423 Md. 689, 2011 Md. LEXIS 774 (Md. 2011).

Pincite

33 A.3d 932 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.