White v. State
This text of 139 S.E. 99 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Since the testimony offered to sustain the defense of alibi did not show the impossibility of the defendant’s presence at the scene of the offense at the time of its commission, but only accounted for his presence at another place before he was at a whisky still that was in operation, it was not error for the court to fail to charge on the defense of alibi.
(a) In the case here the suggested defense of alibi utterly failed, and the evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction of making intoxicating liquor.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 S.E. 99, 37 Ga. App. 158, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-gactapp-1927.