White v. State

106 S.E. 304, 26 Ga. App. 431, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 200
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 8, 1921
Docket12041
StatusPublished

This text of 106 S.E. 304 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. State, 106 S.E. 304, 26 Ga. App. 431, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 200 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Tlie evidence in this case fully authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge.

The special grounds of a motion for a new trial which complain of excerpts from the charge of the court, when the charge of the court is read in its entirety, are without merit.

The newly discovered evidence is not such as would he likely to produce a different verdict upon another trial of the case.

The defendant has had a legal trial, and for no reason appearing in the record was it error for the court to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 S.E. 304, 26 Ga. App. 431, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-gactapp-1921.