White v. State
71 S.E. 135, 136 Ga. 158, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 456
Opinion
The Court of Appeals' certified to this court the following ques- , tion: “Can sodomy be committed by the mouth or otherwise than per anum?” Under the ruling in the case of Herring v. State, 119 Ga. 709 (46 S. E. 876), the foregoing question is answered in the affirmative. After a review, upon request by counsel for plaintiff in error, of the case of Herring v. State, this court is of the opinion that the ruling made in that case should not be reversed, and the law as there stated applicable to the instant case must stand as the rule in this State.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. State, 71 S.E. 135, 136 Ga. 158, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 456 (Ga. 1911).
71 S.E. 135 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Riley v. Garrett
133 S.E.2d 367 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
State v. Simpson
50 N.W.2d 601 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1951)
Barton v. State
53 S.E.2d 707 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Lefavour v. State
1943 OK CR 106 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1943)
Wharton v. State
198 S.E. 823 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Garrad v. State
216 N.W. 496 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1927)
Koontz v. the People
263 P. 19 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1927)
Wise v. Commonwealth
115 S.E. 508 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1923)
Comer v. State
94 S.E. 314 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Ex Parte De Ford
1917 OK CR 192 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1917)
Glover v. State
101 N.E. 629 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1913)