White v. State
This text of 71 S.E. 135 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court of Appeals' certified to this court the following ques- , tion: “Can sodomy be committed by the mouth or otherwise than per anum?” Under the ruling in the case of Herring v. State, 119 Ga. 709 (46 S. E. 876), the foregoing question is answered in the affirmative. After a review, upon request by counsel for plaintiff in error, of the case of Herring v. State, this court is of the opinion that the ruling made in that case should not be reversed, and the law as there stated applicable to the instant case must stand as the rule in this State.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 S.E. 135, 136 Ga. 158, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-ga-1911.