White v. State
This text of 355 So. 2d 492 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was tried non jury and found guilty under a two-count information charging him with possession of heroin and methaqualone.
The sole point on appeal questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s finding of guilt.
We have carefully considered appellant’s contentions in the light of the record and briefs and have concluded that the evidence adduced was sufficient to support the court’s finding of guilt and that no reversible error has been made to appear. Dawson v. State, 338 So.2d 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Amato v. State, 296 So.2d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
355 So. 2d 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.