White v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

White v. State

35 So. 2d 724, 160 Fla. 563, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 798

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 15, 1948·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

All questions raised on this appeal have been duly considered and found without merit; the judgment is affirmed.

Counsel in the case are to be complimented for abbreviating the evidence in narrative form which has greatly helped the court in considering the case.

We believe, however, that the crimes of which defendants were respectively adjudged guilty were not sufficiently defined in the judgment so, on that point alone, the judgment is reversed with directions to impose a proper judgment and sentence.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

All questions raised on this appeal have been duly considered and found without merit; the judgment is affirmed.

Counsel in the case are to be complimented for abbreviating the evidence in narrative form which has greatly helped the court in considering the case.

We believe, however, that the crimes of which defendants were respectively adjudged guilty were not sufficiently defined in the judgment so, on that point alone, the judgment is reversed with directions to impose a proper judgment and sentence.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur.

White v. State, 35 So. 2d 724, 160 Fla. 563, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 798 (Fla. 1948).

Pincite

35 So. 2d 724 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.