White v. State

11 So. 2d 891, 152 Fla. 272, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 884
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 4, 1943·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Court of Record be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, TERRELL, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur. BUFORD and CHAPMAN, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 11 So. 2d 891, 152 Fla. 272, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 884 (Fla. 1943).

11 So. 2d 891 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ocean Jasmine Manning v. State of Louisiana
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2020